ACMA’s Attorneys Attempt to Clarify Order Form Messaging, Timing, Legislation & Other Post-Wayfair Confusion By Martin Eisenstein & Matthew Schaefer A lot has happened since the Supreme Court issued its decision last month in South Dakota v. Wayfair. As we wrote in our prior column, the Supreme Court replaced the bright line test of “physical presence” […]
Life After Quill: What Happens Now? By Martin Eisenstein & David Bertoni The Supreme Court’s rejection of the “physical presence” sales tax collection standard of Quill Corp. v. North Dakota in its June 21st South Dakota v. Wayfair ruling (5-4 majority, with a spirited dissent by Chief Justice Roberts), doesn’t mean this story is over just […]
ACMA’s Legal Team Successfully Leads Online Seller Newegg in ‘Bama While not necessarily a precursor to the forthcoming Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., we’re excited to report a significant win for ACMA’s lawyers at Brann & Isaacson. Yesterday, the Alabama Tax Tribunal ruled in favor of e-commerce merchant Newegg in its challenge […]
During ACMA’s 11th Annual National Catalog Forum in Washington on May 22nd, Marty presented with Jonathan Johnson, Board member of Overstock, on the “Kill Quill” state tax laws and the impact on industry members of the U.S. Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Overstock, Newegg case. Then on May 23rd, most […]
ACMA’s Attorneys Break Down SCOTUS Arguments In South Dakota v. Wayfair Hearing By Martin Eisenstein & David Bertoni No doubt, you have read articles in which so called “experts” predict that Quill is dead. The argument goes that since at least four Justices of the Court had granted the request of South Dakota to grant […]